Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A prime commercial property in Worli, Mumbai ("Garment House"), had been leased in 1949 and later redeveloped under a 98-year supplementary lease. After the original lessee's death, an eviction suit was eventually decreed in favour of the lessors' side (by then including the appellant, Sumer Corporation, which had purchased the property's rights in 2008 for Rs. 5.5 crore). While the tenant's revision against that eviction decree was pending, the Bombay High Court stayed the eviction but ordered the tenant to pay interim compensation of only Rs. 2,50,000 per month, calculated by taking a 6.5% annual return on the Rs. 5.5 crore purchase price. Sumer Corporation appealed, arguing this amount was far below the property's actual rental value.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court's method, basing compensation on 6.5% return of the price the current owner happened to pay for the property: was legally unsound, because it could produce arbitrarily low figures depending on when and how cheaply an owner acquired the property, contrary to the settled principle from Atma Ram Properties v. Federal Motors (as followed in State of Maharashtra v. Super Max International) that a tenant staying on after an eviction decree must pay compensation at the rate the landlord could actually have earned by re-letting the premises in the open market. Since the High Court had not undertaken that market-rate exercise, the Court set aside the compensation determination and remitted the matter back to the High Court to redetermine it correctly within six months, allowing both sides to lead evidence on the true rental value. As an interim arrangement until the fresh determination, the tenant was directed to continue paying at least the existing Rs. 2,50,000 per month.
When a court orders a tenant to pay compensation as a condition for staying an eviction decree, the amount must reflect what the landlord could genuinely earn by renting out the property in the market, not an artificial figure derived from the owner's historical purchase price, which can produce an unfairly low (or high) result unrelated to actual rental value.
