Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Uncategorized (needs manual review)Supreme Court of India

Surender Mohan vs The State of Haryana

Review Petition (Civil)Decided 11 Jan 2022
Review Petition (Civil) No.1407 of 2021
Uday Umesh Lalit · Ajay Rastogi

Background

The petitioner's special leave petitions before the Supreme Court had earlier been dismissed on the ground of limitation, since there was a delay of 2,659 and 3,017 days (roughly 7 to 8 years) in filing them, and no satisfactory explanation for such an extraordinary delay was offered. The petitioner then filed this review petition asking the Court to reconsider that dismissal.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court examined the grounds raised in the review petition and found no error apparent on the face of the record that would justify interfering with its earlier order. Given the extremely long, unexplained delay of several years in approaching the Court in the first place, the Bench held there was no basis to reopen the matter and dismissed the review petition.

Lesson Learnt

Courts strictly enforce limitation periods for filing appeals; a delay running into several thousand days, left unexplained, will not be excused, and a review petition cannot be used to get a fresh chance to explain away such delay after the original petition has already been dismissed on that ground.

Surender Mohan vs The State of Haryana – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware