Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Labour & Industrial LawSupreme Court of India

Suresh Paswan vs M/s Kla Construction Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Civil AppealDecided 16 Sept 2022
Civil Appeal No. 6523 of 2022
M.R. Shah · Krishna Murari

Background

Suresh Paswan, a construction worker, fell from the roof of the first floor at his employer's construction site and suffered grievous injuries resulting in 60% permanent disability, certified by a government hospital doctor in 2009. The Commissioner, Employees' Compensation awarded him Rs. 3,74,364/- based on this disability certificate. The employer appealed to the Delhi High Court, which got a Medical Board to re-examine the worker nearly nine years after the accident; that Board found no permanent disability, and the High Court set aside the compensation award on that basis.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that the belated Medical Board examination, conducted about nine years after the accident, could not reliably displace the contemporaneous 2009 disability certificate documenting the injury and its effect on the worker's earning capacity at the relevant time. The Court noted the employer never sought a Medical Board examination before the Commissioner at the earliest opportunity, and that it would be unjust to award the worker nothing given he clearly suffered a genuine injury affecting his earning capacity. Since the worker had already withdrawn Rs. 3,76,236/- (50% of the deposited amount) pursuant to an earlier High Court order, the Court held that this sum, with interest, should be treated as full and final settlement of his compensation claim, and the High Court's judgment quashing the award was itself set aside in part.

Lesson Learnt

A medical re-assessment conducted years after a workplace accident is not automatically more reliable than a certificate issued near the time of injury, and courts will be wary of denying injured workers all compensation based on delayed, employer-initiated medical re-examinations.