Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
This judgment disposed of a batch of appeals by several accused persons in cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In each case, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had filed a complaint against the accused without having first arrested them. After the Special Court took cognizance and issued summons, the accused did not appear, leading the Special Court to issue warrants against them. The accused then approached the Special Court and High Courts seeking anticipatory bail (fearing arrest), but were refused; the Supreme Court had meanwhile protected them from arrest through interim orders while the appeals were pending.
The Supreme Court held that once a PMLA complaint is filed under Section 44(1)(b), the ordinary summons procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure (Sections 200-205) applies, and if the accused was never arrested by the ED before the complaint was filed, the Special Court should normally issue a summons, not a warrant, and the accused appearing on that summons is not to be treated as being "in custody." Because of this, such an accused does not need to apply for bail at all (and the stringent twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA for bail do not even come into play); a warrant issued only for non-appearance can simply be cancelled by giving an undertaking to appear regularly, and furnishing a bond under Section 88 CrPC is not equivalent to bail. The Court also clarified that once cognizance is taken on a complaint, the ED loses the power to independently arrest that accused under Section 19 PMLA. It must instead seek the accused's custody from the Special Court itself. Applying these principles, the Court allowed the appeals, cancelled the warrants against the appellants subject to their filing undertakings and bonds to regularly attend court, and held there was no need to separately examine their anticipatory bail pleas.
A person who has never been arrested and instead appears before a court only because of a summons in a money-laundering complaint is not automatically "in custody" and need not go through the tough bail process: this distinction protects ordinary citizens summoned in PMLA proceedings from being wrongly treated as if they were arrested accused.
