LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

The Central Warehousing Corporation vs Thakur Dwara Kalan Ul-Maruf Baraglan Wala (Dead) & Ors

SLP (C) · 2023 INSC 940Decided 19 Oct 2023
SLP (C) Nos. 30817-30818 of 2016
Vikram Nath · Ahsanuddin Amanullah · Rajesh Bindal as the second judge · Ahsanuddin Amanullah's signature alongside Justice Vikram Nath's

Background

In 2000, land in Naraingarh village, Haryana, was acquired for the Central Warehousing Corporation. The Land Acquisition Collector initially fixed compensation at about Rs 72 per square yard. On a reference by the landowners, the District Court raised this using a 12% flat annual increase over an earlier 1989 land valuation for the same village, and the Punjab & Haryana High Court raised it further still, applying a 15% cumulative annual increase over an 11-year gap. The Corporation, a state-owned entity, appealed to the Supreme Court arguing the 15% cumulative rate was excessive for such a long gap.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court reviewed its own precedents on how to escalate an old base valuation forward in time when there is no direct market evidence for the acquisition date, noting that annual increase rates of 8-15% cumulative had been applied in past cases, but almost always over short gaps of two to five years. Here the gap was an unusually long 11 years, and the Court held that applying a high cumulative rate like 15% over such a long span was unsafe and likely to overstate the true market value, since land prices do not rise steadily and predictably over a decade. Balancing fairness to the landowners against avoiding an inflated burden on a public sector undertaking, the Court fixed a more moderate 8% cumulative annual increase, effectively restoring compensation close to what the original Reference Court had awarded, and set aside the High Court's 15% figure while directing recovery or payment of any resulting difference within two months.

Lesson Learnt

When compensation for acquired land is calculated by projecting an old valuation forward using an annual growth rate, courts should scale the rate down as the time gap widens: a high percentage increase that is reasonable over a few years becomes unreliable and excessive when stretched over a decade or more.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
The Central Warehousing Corporation vs Thakur Dwara Kalan Ul-Maruf Baraglan Wala (Dead) & Ors – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware