Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawSupreme Court of India

The State of Punjab vs. Jaswant Singh

Civil Appeal · 2023 INSC 798Decided 5 Sept 2023
Civil Appeal No. 11871 of 2014
J.K. Maheshwari · K.V. Viswanathan

Background

Jaswant Singh, a probationary Punjab Police constable, was sent on a temporary security duty assignment during his training, and after it ended he failed to report back to his training centre without any intimation. Based on this, the Senior Superintendent of Police discharged him from service under Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules, which allows discharge of a probationer found unlikely to become an efficient officer, without a formal disciplinary inquiry. The trial court and, later, the High Court had both ruled the discharge illegal, holding it violated natural justice since no hearing was given, and ordered his reinstatement with full back benefits.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court explained the established legal distinction between a "simpliciter" discharge (an assessment of suitability, which needs no formal inquiry) and a "punitive" termination founded on proven misconduct (which does require a full inquiry). Applying this test, the Court found that the discharge order here was based purely on the constable's demonstrated unsuitability, his unauthorised prolonged absence and lack of interest in training, and did not allege or rely on any specific act of misconduct as its foundation, unlike other cases cited by the respondent. The Court held that all three lower courts had misapplied Rule 12.21, set aside their judgments, and dismissed Jaswant Singh's original suit.

Lesson Learnt

An employer can discharge a probationer for demonstrated unsuitability without a formal inquiry, so long as the order is genuinely based on an assessment of fitness for the job and not, in substance, a punishment for a specific act of misconduct: the real test is what "founded" the decision, not just the language used.

The State of Punjab vs. Jaswant Singh – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware