Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1094
An older qualification must still satisfy the eligibility rules governing the appointment sought. Here, the certificate's early date did not secure reinstatement, and rejection of eligibility should not be confused with a conclusive finding that the certificate was forged.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1095
A party benefiting from a conditional stay must meet its deposit requirement or face enforcement. The additional ₹15 crore deposit secures the pending dispute; it does not settle the land's final compensation or amount to an immediate payment to the landowners.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1093
An alleged attempt to kill does not become a lesser offence simply because the victim avoided a fatal injury. Restoring this charge means the accusation must be tried; it does not establish that the accused is guilty.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1090
For the assessment in this case, assistance reducing ordinary manufacturing costs was taxable even though the government wanted to encourage industry. The purpose and actual operation of the particular subsidy mattered more than its general development label.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1091
Proof that someone caused a serious injury does not by itself prove the additional ingredients of robbery. A court can substitute a lesser offence supported by the evidence; the sentencing reduction here depended on Appa's particular circumstances.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1092
Someone challenging an election must ensure that the personal-presentation requirement is met and can be proved. Merely entering the court building does not establish compliance, and a filing defect can end the challenge before the election allegations are examined.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1088
An employee who retires on 30 June may be entitled to the increment that falls due on 1 July after completing a year of service. Authorities that delay paying the amounts due must pay interest after the deadline set by the court.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1089
Recruitment must follow the qualifications stated in the advertisement and the governing Recruitment Rules. A court will not override a merit-based eligibility decision made under those rules merely because the candidate concerned was higher in the written test.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8797
A person who occupied property only because of employment has no independent right to remain once the employment and decree end. Even when a petition fails, courts can make practical arrangements to let a person recover personal belongings.
14543 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreThis batch of Miscellaneous Applications/Interlocutory Applications arose out of the Supreme Court's earlier judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu (15 December 2016), which restricted the sale of liquor along and near highways, and subsequent clarificatory orders (31 March 2017 and 11 July 2017) which stated that the restriction did not apply to licensed establishments within "municipal areas." Various applicants sought a further clarification on whether this "municipal areas" exemption also extended to areas governed by other local self-governing bodies or statutory development authorities that were not technically municipalities but were similarly developed or proximate to urban centres.
The Court held that it was not being asked to review or modify its earlier orders, only to interpret paragraph 7 of the 11 July 2017 order. It reasoned that the underlying purpose of the liquor-sale restriction was to address highways connecting cities, towns and villages, and that the "municipal areas" language should not rigidly exclude comparable local self-governing bodies or statutory development authorities. The Court held that state governments are not precluded from determining, as a question of fact, whether an area under a local self-governing body is sufficiently proximate to or developed like a municipal agglomeration to warrant the same exemption, having regard to the nature of development in the area and the object of the highway liquor-ban. Individual licensees were given liberty to make representations to the competent state authorities, who would decide applying this principle. With these clarificatory observations, the batch of MAs/IAs was disposed of.
When the scope of a Supreme Court directive is genuinely ambiguous in its application to similar but technically different local bodies, the Court can clarify the underlying principle and direct state authorities to apply it on a case-by-case factual basis, rather than requiring every affected party to keep returning to the Court.
