Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
Rajmati Singh was appointed an untrained assistant teacher in a UP government school in 1971 but was relieved in 1973 to complete a mandatory training course; she was never allowed to resume duty after 1974 because she produced a different (B.Ed) qualification instead. She made repeated representations over the following decades but never went to a court or tribunal. In 2009, after filing a complaint under the Right to Information Act, the State Information Commission directed the education department to "communicate" its decision on her old representations; a follow-up order in 2014 actually rejected her claim for the first time. She then went to the State Tribunal, which dismissed her case as time-barred, but the Allahabad High Court reversed this and ordered her reinstated with full back pay for over 40 years.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court was wrong. Rajmati Singh's service effectively ended in 1974, and she sat on her rights for over 33 years without approaching any court or tribunal: mere repeated representations do not keep a stale claim alive, and an Information Commission (a body with no authority over service disputes) directing a reply does not revive a dead claim. Relying on precedents including C. Jacob vs. Director of Geology and Mining and Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh, the Court held her claim was hopelessly time-barred and the High Court erred in ignoring the law on delay and limitation. However, noting the State's own prolonged inaction and silence also contributed to raising false hope in her, the Court did not leave her with nothing. It set aside the reinstatement and back-wages order but directed the State to pay her a one-time lump-sum compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 within two months.
A person who believes they were wrongly denied their job must approach a court or tribunal within a reasonable time, writing repeated letters/representations for decades, without more, does not keep a legal claim alive, and courts will not award full reinstatement and back pay after such long, unexplained delay.
