Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The appellant's father, a Haryana Police constable, died on duty in 1997 along with a colleague, Constable Balwan Singh, whose widow was granted compassionate appointment. The appellant, then a seven-year-old minor, had his name entered in the "Minor's Register" in 1998 to reserve a future compassionate appointment, but his claim could only be pursued once he attained majority in 2008, by which time roughly 11 years had passed since his father's death. The State rejected his claim for compassionate appointment, citing 1999 government instructions that required a minor dependent to attain majority within three years of the employee's death, and noting that the "Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased Government Employees" Rules, 2006 (then in force) did not provide for a job under the ex-gratia scheme at all. His writ petition and intra-court appeal before the Punjab & Haryana High Court were both dismissed, leading to this appeal.
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the appellant's claim for compassionate appointment itself, holding that compassionate appointment is an exception to the normal rule of open, competitive recruitment and can only be granted strictly per the rules/policy in force: the 2006 Rules governing his claim did not authorise a job under the ex-gratia scheme, and the appellant could not claim parity under Article 14 with a few earlier, differently-timed cases where a job was mistakenly or exceptionally granted, since an illegal or extra-legal benefit given to someone else does not create an enforceable right for others. However, the Court noted that the widow of the deceased constable had never been informed by the authorities of her own entitlement to claim lump-sum ex-gratia compensation (as opposed to a job) at the relevant time, and that this administrative failure to intimate her was the reason she never applied for it. The Court therefore granted the widow (and the appellant's mother) one opportunity to make a fresh representation for lump-sum ex-gratia compensation, directing the competent authority to decide it within six weeks, with interest payable if the decision or payment is delayed.
Compassionate appointment is a rules-bound exception, not a right that can be claimed by analogy to isolated past exceptions or delayed indefinitely by a minor dependent; but where the State fails to properly inform a bereaved family of the ex-gratia monetary benefits actually available to them, courts can revive that claim even years later.
