Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Uma Priyadarshini S. vs. Suchith K Nair

Civil AppealDecided 6 Jan 2022
Civil Appeal Nos. 204-206 of 2022
Indira Banerjee · J.K. Maheshwari

Background

The appellant wife had sought interim maintenance for herself and her minor son from her husband, a commercial pilot, before the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, who granted her Rs. 25,000 per month plus the child's actual educational expenses. On revision, the Madras High Court denied the wife any maintenance (holding she was gainfully employed) and reduced the child's maintenance to Rs. 15,000 per month. The wife appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing the reduced amount was grossly inadequate, while the husband's counsel pointed to the financial hit pilots took during the COVID-19 pandemic due to reduced flying hours.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court found the High Court's reduced amount of Rs. 15,000 per month for the child "a pittance, too meagre" and set aside the High Court's order. Rather than fixing a final maintenance amount itself, the Court directed the concerned family court to decide the maintenance issue afresh within six months, taking into account both parties' income, assets and dependents, after full financial disclosure by both sides. In the interim, the Court ordered the husband to bear the child's actual educational and medical expenses, pay Rs. 30,000 per month for the child's other needs plus Rs. 11,000 per month toward the wife's house rent, and pay a lump sum of Rs. 1,00,000 toward the wife's litigation costs.

Lesson Learnt

Interim maintenance orders are meant to be adequate and realistic, not token amounts, and courts retain the power to fix a fair interim figure, including litigation costs, while directing a full, evidence-based redetermination by the appropriate family court.

Uma Priyadarshini S. vs. Suchith K Nair – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware