Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Service & Administrative LawSupreme Court of India

Union of India vs E. Krishna Rao

Not availableDecided 28 Jan 2022
Not available
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · Sanjiv Khanna

Background

This is a follow-up order in a long-running dispute over arrears owed to All India Radio/Doordarshan's TV News Correspondents (TVNCs) and TV Assistant News Correspondents (TVANCs), stemming from a Supreme Court judgment dated 26 September 2018 (in a case involving one Sudhanshu Ranjan). The Union of India filed miscellaneous applications and contempt petitions seeking clarity on how to extend the benefit of that 2018 judgment to other similarly-placed employees who were not original parties to the case, and a related review petition on the same issue had been dismissed on 27 January 2022.

Decision Breakdown

The Court disposed of the applications and contempt petitions by recording the Union's undertaking that people who were parties to the earlier proceedings would get arrears on the same footing as Sudhanshu Ranjan, to be released by 15 March 2022. It further directed that benefits due to persons who were not parties to the earlier case would become payable from the date of the original 2018 judgment itself, without those persons needing to separately move the Court: this was extended to also cover TV Assistant News Editors (TVANEs), a similarly situated category, with disbursement by 30 June 2022.

Lesson Learnt

Once a court lays down a service-benefit principle for a category of government employees, the government can be directed to extend that benefit to the entire similarly-situated class on its own initiative, rather than forcing every individual employee to litigate separately to claim the same right.

Union of India vs E. Krishna Rao – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware