Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Arbitration & Commercial LawSupreme Court of India

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bansal Wood Products Pvt. Ltd.

Civil Appeal · 2025 INSC 39Decided 8 Jan 2025
Civil Appeal No. 104 of 2025 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 15799 of 2023)
Justice Abhay S. Oka · Justice Manmohan

Background

The respondent had made an insurance claim that the appellant insurance company did not pay, leading the respondent to first pursue the matter before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and then invoke arbitration under the insurance contract. The Arbitral Tribunal eventually awarded the claim with 12% annual interest, and the High Court of Delhi dismissed the insurance company's challenge to that award. The insurer argued it should not have to pay interest for the years the claimant spent pursuing the consumer forum route before coming to arbitration.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court noted that the Arbitral Tribunal itself had only condoned the delay in seeking arbitration, and treated the claim as filed within time, from 6th March 2010, after excluding the period the claimant spent before the Consumer Commission under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The Court held that fairness required interest to run from that same date, rather than from an earlier point, and modified the award accordingly, directing the insurer to pay the outstanding balance within four weeks.

Lesson Learnt

Where a claimant's own delay in approaching the correct forum is legally excused only from a certain date, courts will calibrate interest awards to run from that same date rather than an earlier one: fairness runs both ways in delayed-claim disputes.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bansal Wood Products Pvt. Ltd. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware