Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1073
In circumstantial-evidence cases, forensic and DNA evidence must actually corroborate the alleged crime: a conviction cannot survive where the most crucial scientific evidence, on its own terms, points away from rather than toward the prosecution's theory.
Criminal Appeal · 2026 INSC 1074
A conviction based purely on circumstantial evidence requires every link in the chain, timeline, witness credibility, forensic matches, and motive, to be proven beyond reasonable doubt; gaps or suppressed evidence at any link entitle the accused to the benefit of the doubt, even in a serious case like a double murder.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8505
Courts will not quash a criminal case merely because the accused has a plausible alibi-type defence; unless that defence is conclusive and undisputed, the matter must be tested through the ordinary trial process.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8547
A private compromise between victim and accused cannot by itself secure quashing of a case involving serious, heinous allegations like attempted murder with a weapon: such matters must proceed to trial regardless of settlement.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8563
Railway Claims Tribunals cannot reject a bona fide passenger's death claim based on speculative inferences when there is no direct evidence of an alternative cause of death; the compensation scheme under the Railways Act is to be interpreted generously in favour of victims' families.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case · 2026:DHC:8559
In matrimonial offences, courts can and do quash criminal proceedings once a genuine compromise is verified directly with the complainant, sparing both parties a prolonged and pointless trial.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8541
A co-accused's bail does not automatically extend to another accused where their actual roles in the offence differ materially; delay caused by one's own defence counsel cannot later be used as a ground for bail.
Execution Petition · 2026:DHC:8567
An arbitral award must be adequately stamped before a court can enforce it; courts give only a limited window to cure such defects, after which the award becomes legally unusable until the deficiency is fixed.
Arbitration Petition · 2026:DHC:8555
A genuine settlement reached through mediation renders a pending arbitration-related court petition moot, allowing parties to close out litigation quickly once they resolve their dispute privately.
7878 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
A single home-buyer in a real-estate project called "Sushant Megapolis" filed a writ petition directly before the Supreme Court under Article 32, seeking cancellation of agreements with the developers, refund of money paid by buyers, appointment of a court-monitored committee headed by a retired judge, a forensic audit, and a CBI investigation into alleged fraud by the developers and authority officials. He argued the petition should be tagged with a similar pending matter concerning the same developer's Lucknow project.
The Supreme Court declined to entertain the petition, relying on its own recent three-judge bench ruling in Shelly Lal v. Union of India, which had held that Article 32 is not the right forum for supervising completion of a stalled construction project: that would draw the Court into day-to-day project management, financing and execution, which is beyond judicial review's proper role. The Court noted that specific statutory remedies already exist for home-buyers: the Consumer Protection Act, the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, each with their own fora and representative-complaint mechanisms. It also noted the petitioner was a single buyer purporting to seek relief as if representing an entire class, with no basis to assume all buyers wanted the same remedy (cancellation/refund versus completion of construction). Criminal investigation requests, the Court held, must go through the ordinary Code of Criminal Procedure framework rather than directly to the Supreme Court. The petition was accordingly dismissed, while clarifying the petitioner remains free to pursue the statutory remedies available to him.
Aggrieved home-buyers in stalled real estate projects should approach the specialized fora created by RERA, Consumer Protection law, or the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rather than the Supreme Court directly under Article 32, which is reserved for cases genuinely requiring constitutional intervention, not judicial supervision of ordinary commercial projects.
