Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Motor Accident Compensation LawDelhi High Court

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs. Saurabh Kumar & Anr. and connected matters

Motor Accident Claims Appeal · 2026:DHC:7594Decided 7 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
MAC.APP. 461/2025, MAC.APP. 665/2025CNR: DLHC010480162025
Justice Anish Dayal

Background

A bus belonging to the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation struck a motorcyclist in Aligarh, UP, in January 2020, leaving the young rider (then a student) 80% visually disabled with a fractured leg. The MACT awarded him about Rs 64 lakh in compensation and rejected the Corporation's objection that a Delhi court had no jurisdiction. Both the Corporation and the injured claimant cross-appealed.

Decision Breakdown

The Court rejected the Corporation's jurisdiction objection, since the claimant's Aadhaar history and other evidence showed he had actually been living in Delhi for years before the accident. It upheld the finding of rash driving based on the injured witness's identification of the bus and the police FIR. It enhanced the claimant's disability assessment from 80% to 90% and substantially raised his attendant-care compensation from Rs 50,000 to a lump sum of Rs 10 lakh, since he could still move about despite his blindness. Total compensation rose to roughly Rs 79 lakh.

Lesson Learnt

A claimant's identity documents will not automatically defeat a compensation claim just because they show an out-of-state permanent address: actual, proven residence controls which court has jurisdiction; and courts can revisit both the disability percentage and specific compensation heads like attendant care on appeal if the trial court's original assessment appears too conservative.

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs. Saurabh Kumar & Anr. and connected matters – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware