Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Motor Accident Compensation LawSupreme Court of India

Velayudhan vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Civil AppealDecided 7 Sept 2022
Civil Appeal No. 6164 of 2022
M.R. Shah · Krishna Murari

Background

The appellant suffered extremely serious injuries in a road accident (including a head injury with brain stem damage, multiple fractures, burns, and lacerations) resulting in 68% permanent disability as assessed by the Tribunal, later raised to 100% by the Kerala High Court. The Claims Tribunal awarded compensation under various heads, including only Rs. 50,000 for "pain and suffering," based on a monthly income of Rs. 2,000. On appeal, the High Court enhanced the future economic loss component (raising assumed income to Rs. 3,000/month) but left other heads, including pain and suffering, unchanged, bringing the total to Rs. 8,24,800. The claimant, a mason by occupation, appealed to the Supreme Court seeking further enhancement.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that Rs. 50,000 for pain and suffering was grossly inadequate given the claimant's serious, prolonged, and traumatic injuries, and raised it to Rs. 4,00,000. It also held the High Court erred in assessing the claimant's income at only Rs. 3,000 per month for a mason with 100% disability; considering minimum wages payable to a mason and future income growth, the Court fixed income at Rs. 5,000 per month and applied a multiplier of 15 (based on the claimant's age of 40). The appeal was allowed and the compensation was substantially enhanced to a total of Rs. 15,42,800, with 7.5% annual interest from the date of the claim petition, to be paid by the insurance company within eight weeks.

Lesson Learnt

In motor accident compensation cases, courts must realistically assess a claimant's actual earning capacity (e.g., applicable minimum wages for their trade) rather than arbitrarily low income figures, and compensation for pain and suffering must genuinely reflect the severity and permanence of the injuries suffered, not a token amount.

Velayudhan vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware