Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Criminal LawDelhi High Court

Vijay Kumar vs. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Bail Application · CNR No. DLHC010350872026Decided 23 Sept 2026New Delhi Bench
BAIL APPLN. 3088/2026CNR: DLHC010350872026
Justice Mini Pushkarna

Background

The applicant-husband was arrested on 28.01.2025 in FIR No. 91/2025 (PS Dwarka South) after allegedly attacking his wife during a courtroom hearing in one of their ongoing matrimonial cases, an offence under Section 109(1) BNS. He had earlier filed six bail applications before the Trial Court, of which four were withdrawn and two dismissed. By the time of this hearing, the wife had withdrawn all matrimonial cases against him, including divorce and guardianship petitions.

Decision Breakdown

The complainant-wife appeared in Court and told the judge directly that she had withdrawn all cases, no longer wished to pursue the criminal case, and intended to resume living with her husband's family once he was released; the couple has an 11-year-old son. The State, in view of the complainant's stance, also had no objection to bail. The Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, subject to standard conditions such as appearing at every hearing, providing address and mobile number to police, weekly reporting to the police station, and not tampering with evidence or committing any further offence.

Lesson Learnt

In matrimonial-dispute-linked criminal cases, genuine reconciliation confirmed directly by the complainant to the Court, including withdrawal of connected civil/matrimonial proceedings, is a significant factor courts weigh heavily in favour of granting bail, even where custody and formal charges remain.

Vijay Kumar vs. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware