LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Tax & Customs LawSupreme Court of India

Wave Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of U.P.

Civil Appeal · 2022 INSC 1281Decided 15 Dec 2022
Civil Appeal No. 9272 of 2022
K.M. Joseph · Hrishikesh Roy

Background

Wave Industries purchased the loss-making Amroha sugar mill from the U.P. State Sugar Corporation (UPSSCL) through a Slump Sale Agreement (17.7.2010) and a subsequent sale deed (4.10.2010). After the purchase, tax authorities sought to recover outstanding duty, penalty and interest of about Rs. 5.68 lakh relating to the mill's operations from before the sale, and the State government held the purchaser (Wave Industries) liable to pay these dues. The High Court of Allahabad upheld this, reading the agreement's clause on "contingent liabilities" as transferring pre-sale dues to the purchaser; Wave Industries appealed.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that the specific clauses of the Sale Deed and the Slump Sale Agreement (Clauses 9, 12.1 and 12.2) clearly assigned liabilities arising before the "signing date" to the seller (UPSSCL) and only post-signing liabilities to the purchaser. The Court found that a definite business liability that had already arisen before the sale, even if only quantified or demanded later, is not a mere "contingent liability" that could be shifted to the purchaser under the agreement's general clause; the specific provisions must override the general one. Since the disputed dues related entirely to the period before the purchaser took over, they remained the seller's responsibility, and the High Court's order and the State's speaking order fastening this liability on the purchaser were set aside.

Lesson Learnt

In a business sale or slump-sale agreement, specific contractual clauses allocating pre- and post-sale liabilities will prevail over vaguer general clauses about "contingent liabilities", and a liability that has already accrued before a sale, even if not yet quantified, is not "contingent" and cannot simply be passed on to the buyer unless the contract clearly says so.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Wave Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of U.P. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware