Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Family LawSupreme Court of India

Yagwati @ Poonam vs. Ghanshyam

Not available · 2024 INSC 76Decided 29 Jan 2024
Not available

Background

The appellant wife and respondent husband married in 1982, and after the marriage broke down in 1998 the parties lived separately. The Family Court at Jaipur had granted the wife Rs. 3,000/month maintenance, later enhanced by the Rajasthan High Court to Rs. 6,000-10,000/month depending on the period. The wife appealed for a further increase, pointing to an RTI response showing the husband earned over Rs. 1 lakh/month as an Assistant Manager at BSNL; the husband responded that he had since retired and now received only a pension.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court considered the parties' circumstances and enhanced the maintenance to Rs. 20,000/month with effect from the date of its order, and directed that arrears be paid in instalments alongside the regular maintenance. It directed the Family Court, Jaipur to quantify the total arrears and fix a payment schedule such that the combined monthly deduction (regular maintenance plus arrears) does not exceed 50% of the husband's BSNL pension, and directed BSNL itself to ensure the amounts are credited monthly into the wife's bank account.

Lesson Learnt

Maintenance awards are not frozen for life. Courts can revisit and increase them to reflect a spouse's real earning capacity, including post-retirement pension, and can direct an employer to ensure compliance directly, giving the dependent spouse a more reliable route to actually receiving payment.

Yagwati @ Poonam vs. Ghanshyam – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware