Real judgements, distilled
Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.
Transfer Petition (Criminal) · 2026 INSC 1060
Where a marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties reach a genuine, voluntary settlement, including on alimony, the Supreme Court can use its Article 142 powers to grant a mutual-consent divorce and close out all related litigation in one stroke, without requiring the usual statutory waiting period.
Writ Petition (Civil) · 2026 INSC 1061
In long-running, complex litigation involving apportioned government liabilities across states, the Supreme Court can use a mechanism like a retired-judge committee plus periodic compliance affidavits to bring genuine finality, including firm timelines, transparency obligations, and interest for delayed payment, rather than leaving matters open-ended.
Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 1062
In an "as is where is" liquidation auction, a bidder who voluntarily accepts the auction terms cannot later resile from a forfeiture clause by citing regulatory caps or after-the-fact excuses for non-payment: courts will enforce the auction notice's own conditions.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8338-DB
Once someone is released from custody because the police failed to properly communicate the grounds of arrest, the police cannot simply re-arrest them by adding new charges: a specific, court-supervised procedure with senior-officer accountability must be followed, or the re-arrest itself becomes illegal.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8308
In economic-offence cases, bail can still be granted where the method used to quantify the alleged financial evasion is not adequately justified, and where the apprehension of re-offending is speculative rather than evidence-based.
Writ Petition (Criminal) · 2026:DHC:8323
A parole claim must be backed by a genuine, verifiable application to the competent jail authority: courts will scrutinise irregularities like an incomplete address, an unexplained thumb mark, or reliance on a mere friend's affidavit rather than close family.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8337
Courts can grant short, strictly time-bound interim bail purely on humanitarian/compassionate grounds (such as caring for a seriously ill family member), even while a case remains pending trial and an earlier bail plea has failed.
Bail Application · 2026:DHC:8312
Courts will not repeatedly re-examine a bail plea already rejected on merits unless the applicant can point to a genuine change in circumstances since the earlier order.
First Appeal from Order · 2026:DHC:8334
Under the no-fault compensation scheme for railway accidents, a valid ticket-holder injured while attempting to board a train, even carelessly, is generally entitled to compensation unless the railway can show a deliberate, conscious exposure to danger, not mere negligence.
6171 more judgements for members
You're seeing the newest cases. Log in — it's free — to keep scrolling, search by name or judge, and filter by court or legal area.
Log in to see moreLegal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).
The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.
Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.
Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.
Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.
Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.
The plaintiff had purchased agricultural land from his father-in-law (the first defendant) under a registered sale deed of 1963, paying part of the price to clear the seller's existing mortgage debts. The father-in-law later executed a unilateral deed purporting to cancel the sale, and then gifted the same land to another daughter (the second defendant). After the plaintiff was dispossessed through separate criminal proceedings, he sued for a declaration of his title and for possession, while the defendants argued that under the Bihar practice known as "ta khubzul badlain," title only transfers once the full sale consideration is actually exchanged, which they claimed had not happened. The trial court ruled for the plaintiff, but the Patna High Court reversed, holding no valid title had passed and dismissing the suit.
The Supreme Court held that under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, a registered sale deed ordinarily transfers title immediately, and that the Bihar-specific exception of "ta khubzul badlain", where title is postponed until an actual exchange of consideration, applies only where the document's own terms clearly show that was the parties' intention. Examining the translated sale deed, the Court found explicit recitals that possession and ownership had already passed to the plaintiff and that nothing further was due from him, so the exception did not apply here. It further held that even if part of the consideration had genuinely remained unpaid, the seller's remedy would at most be a charge on the property for that amount (under Section 55(4)(b) of the Act), not a right to unilaterally cancel the sale, and in any event the father-in-law's cancellation deed, executed without the plaintiff's consent, was not legally binding on him. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's judgment set aside, and the trial court's decree restored.
Once a registered sale deed with clear recitals of transferred title and possession is executed, the seller cannot unilaterally "cancel" it later even if he later disputes whether the full price was actually paid: his only remedy, if any, is to sue for the unpaid balance or enforce a charge over the property, not to undo the sale on his own.
