LegalAware
LegalAware.ai
EMPOWERING LEGAL AWARENESS

Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Yuvraj @ Munna Pralhad Jagdale & Ors. vs. Janardan Subajirao Wide (Dead) through LRs

Civil Appeal · 2023 INSC 266Decided 21 Mar 2023
Civil Appeal Nos. 2855-2856 of 2011
Sudhanshu Dhulia · Sanjay Kumar

Background

A landlord family sued to evict a tenant running a hotel in Pune, alleging the tenant had unlawfully transferred his business/possession to a third person, Krishna B Shetty, in breach of the lease and Section 13(1)(e) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947. The trial court and first appellate court both decreed eviction after finding the tenant had signed both a partnership agreement and a separate assignment agreement handing over the hotel business to Shetty for consideration. The Bombay High Court reversed this on writ, reasoning that a mere partnership arrangement with continued nominal possession did not amount to sub-letting, and that a special proviso allowed such transfers despite the lease's prohibition; it also dismissed the landlord's review petition.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held the High Court's reliance on the Section 15(1) proviso was misconceived because no government notification actually permitting such transfers existed. On facts, it held that while a genuine partnership alone would not constitute sub-letting (per precedents Parvinder Singh and Mahendra Saree Emporium), the tenant here had gone further and executed a separate, admitted assignment agreement transferring his business to Shetty for Rs. 2,00,000 with earnest money paid: that act alone completed the breach of the no-assignment clause in the lease and the statutory bar under Section 15(1), irrespective of Shetty's later unsuccessful suit for specific performance. The Court therefore set aside the High Court's judgments, restored the eviction decree of the trial and appellate courts, and directed the tenant's legal heirs to hand over vacant possession within two months.

Lesson Learnt

A tenant who formally assigns or transfers their business/possession in the leased premises to a third party for consideration, even if dressed up first as a partnership, breaches a no-assignment lease condition the moment the assignment document is executed, and later disputes between the tenant and the transferee do not undo that breach.

Official source (sci.gov.in)View Judgment (PDF)
Yuvraj @ Munna Pralhad Jagdale & Ors. vs. Janardan Subajirao Wide (Dead) through LRs – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware