Real judgements, distilled

Legal Case Shots

Court judgements broken down into the case type, how the decision played out, and the lesson worth remembering, with the full judgement available as a PDF.

Frequently asked questions

Is this suitable for use in legal research and court filings?+

Legal Case Shots is built to help you quickly identify and understand relevant precedent. For citation in pleadings or filings, always verify against the full judgment PDF and current citation format (e.g., 2026 INSC ___).

How is a "lesson learnt" different from the judgment's holding?+

The holding is what the court legally decided. The lesson learnt translates that into a practical takeaway: what a lawyer should factor into case strategy or client advice as a result of this precedent.

Is the full judgment available, or just a summary?+

Both. Each case shows a distilled summary (case type, key holding, and lesson learnt) and links to the full judgment as a PDF for when you need the complete text for research or citation.

Can I filter judgments by date or case type?+

Yes. Use Advanced Filters to narrow results by decision date and by practice area, including Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Service & Administrative Law, Family Law, Civil Property & Inheritance, and Labour & Industrial Law.

Can I search judgments by a specific judge?+

Yes. You can filter judgments by the judge or bench that decided the case, which is useful for tracking how a particular judge has reasoned on similar issues across multiple rulings.

What is Legal Case Shots?+

Legal Case Shots is a searchable database of Supreme Court of India judgments, each broken down into the case type, the court's key holding, and a practical lesson learnt, with the full judgment available as a PDF for citation or deeper reading.

Civil Property & InheritanceSupreme Court of India

Zaki Ullah Khan v. State of U.P. and Ors.

Civil Appeal · 2026 INSC 827Decided 15 Jul 2026
Civil Appeal No. 2412/2011
Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra · Justice Shree Chandrashekhar

Background

Zaki Ullah Khan won an auction conducted by the Uttar Pradesh government for fishing rights over the Sharda Sagar Jalashya (reservoir) in Pilibhit for the period 5 September 1998 to 30 June 2001, under a deed described as a "licence for fishing." The Collector, Pilibhit found that despite being called a licence, the deed actually amounted to a lease of immovable property and demanded deficit stamp duty of Rs. 15,72,525, a decision upheld by the Chief Controlling Authority and then by the Allahabad High Court. Khan appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing his case was on par with an earlier Supreme Court order (Farookh Ahmad) that had set aside a similar demand.

Decision Breakdown

The Supreme Court held that a right to catch and rear fish in a specific water body over a fixed term, granted for value, amounts to a "profit à prendre", a right to take something (fish) from land or water belonging to another, and is therefore a transfer of an interest in immovable property, not a mere personal permission. Since the document ran for more than a year and was worth more than Rs. 100, it required compulsory registration and attracted stamp duty as a lease under the Registration Act and Stamp Act. The Court distinguished the Farookh Ahmad precedent Khan relied on, noting that in that earlier case the High Court had failed to examine the actual terms of the licence, whereas here the Collector and appellate authorities had carefully analysed the deed's terms before concluding it was a lease. The appeal was dismissed.

Lesson Learnt

What a document is called ("licence," "permit," etc.) does not determine its legal character. Courts look at its actual substance and terms; a right to extract a resource like fish from a water body for a fee over a fixed period can be treated as a lease of immovable property attracting stamp duty and compulsory registration.

Zaki Ullah Khan v. State of U.P. and Ors. – Legal Case Shots | LegalAware